Quality of Earnings and Add-Backs: An Owner’s Preparation Guide

Begin with the question behind the request

When a buyer asks about earnings quality, the owner may hear a challenge to the integrity of the business. A more useful starting point is to ask what the buyer needs to understand about the accounts and ongoing performance. An earnings figure is the beginning of that discussion, not its conclusion.

Independent quality-of-earnings work can examine the sustainability of earnings, accounting matters, working capital, and related financial issues under an agreed scope. It is distinct from a financial statement audit. Marshall & Stevens describes these areas in its overview of quality-of-earnings studies. The procedures, intended users, and limitations of a particular engagement belong in the provider’s agreement.

Reference: Marshall & Stevens on quality-of-earnings studies

Build the schedule before defending the adjustment

For every proposed add-back, create a record with the period, account, amount, source document, explanation, and view of whether the expense continues. Keep the original reported result visible. A reader should be able to move from the financial statements to the adjustment schedule without guessing how the pieces connect.

Then write the strongest reasonable question a buyer could ask about each item. Did the expense actually stop? Was it truly unusual? Will another cost replace it? Has the same category appeared in other periods? This exercise exposes weak reasoning before a negotiation makes every question feel adversarial.

Owner compensation requires a role analysis

An owner’s compensation and the cost of operating the company are related, but they are not interchangeable. If you manage sales, supervise operations, and approve purchasing, the business will still need those functions after a transfer. A proposed adjustment should account for the assumed future operating model and any necessary replacement resources.

Make a simple responsibility inventory. Record what you do, who could take it over, and what remains uncertain. Have the relevant professionals assess compensation and accounting assumptions. The point is to avoid a schedule that removes an owner expense while quietly assuming the owner’s work continues for free.

Keep historical adjustments separate from future improvements

A cost incurred during an unusual historical event is a different proposition from savings a buyer hopes to achieve after acquiring the company. Likewise, a signed contract, an active proposal, and an aspirational growth target should not be blended into one revenue narrative. Label the categories and preserve the evidence for each.

Use separate schedules for reported results, proposed historical adjustments, and prospective scenarios. A reader can then evaluate each layer on its own terms. This does not establish that an adjustment is correct or that a projection will occur. It makes the discussion more precise and the disagreements easier to locate.

Reconcile the reporting package and explain the gaps

Create a source map that identifies the accounting system, statement version, period, and person responsible for each schedule. List differences between management reports, financial statements, and tax records where relevant. Ask the accountant to explain accounting questions rather than changing a number simply to make two presentations match.

Maintain an issue log with the question, evidence needed, assigned person, and current status. If a material record is missing, say so. An early gap gives the team a chance to investigate, reconstruct appropriate support, or change the presentation. A late surprise can force that same work into an already crowded transaction timetable.

Do not let earnings hide the cash cycle

An owner also needs to explain how operations use cash. Prepare to discuss when customers pay, how inventory is managed, when suppliers are paid, and what equipment or systems need investment. Keep these questions separate from the add-back argument so a favorable earnings presentation does not obscure a practical funding need.

Ask the transaction team which periods and definitions will be relevant to a future working-capital discussion. The actual mechanism depends on negotiated terms and specialist advice. At the preparation stage, the useful task is making the operating pattern understandable and identifying records the team cannot yet produce consistently.

Choose the right preparation and diligence roles

Start by asking what the current decision requires. If the records are disorganized, work with the accountant and an analytical preparation advisor to establish a reliable foundation. If an independent quality-of-earnings report is needed, discuss scope, timing, access, and reliance directly with the qualified provider. One engagement should not be represented as the other.

StoneBridge’s financial analysis service is framed around owner-side preparation and decision support. Bring the adjustment schedule, source map, and issue log to a scoping conversation. You will be better positioned to explain the company and to identify the questions that require independent accounting work.

Explore Financial Analysis

Connect the findings to a valuation perspective